Judging

 

The Money Marketing Awards judging panels are made up of top-level professionals specific to the adviser sectors. They have been selected to give a professional and wide-ranging level of expertise in order to judge the awards.

Awards will be made solely at the discretion of the judges. No feedback or correspondence will be entered into about the results and the judges' decisions are final.

 

Judging process


STAGE 1 

Adviser and Advertising category entrants complete online entry form containing category-specific questions against an array of criteria

Provider category nominations submitted by Money Marketing’s adviser community & readership via a survey

 

STAGE 2

Adviser longlist created by the Money Marketing editorial team, then scored online by judging panel criteria, creating shortlist  

Advertising longlist created by Money Marketing editorial team

Provider shortlist created depending on spread of scores, shortlist is then invited to complete a category specific entry form which is scored by the judging panel

 

STAGE 3

Adviser shortlist interviewed with category specific judging panel who then decide the winner

Advertising shortlist and winners decided by money marketing advisory board judging panel and advertising experts who discuss both entry form and physical material before deciding on winner

Provider winners decided by money marketing advisory board judging panel


 

2017 Judges



The judging panel in 2017 included representatives from: Aegon, Aspect8, Eversheds, Kames Capital, OneSavings Bank plc, People’s Pension, Platforum, Protection Review, Retirement Advantage, Swiss Re, Unbiased and Zurich.